Major Sea Regimes’ Lessons for Nowpap
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 21세기정치학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 21세기정치학회보 / 15권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : 조경근
ㆍ저자명 : 조경근
목차
Ⅰ. IntroductionⅡ. NOWPAP
Ⅲ. Analysis of NOWPAP's problem
Ⅳ. Major sea regimes and their lessons
V. Conclusion: Lesson to NOWPAP
References
한국어 초록
NOWPAP is an environmental regime initiated and supported by the UNEP with the purpose of recovering and protecting Northeast Asian seas from pollution, stimulated by the success of programs in the Mediterranean region. Unlike the Mediterranean regime, NOWPAP has not yet achieved anything substantial, nor is likely to do so in the foreseeable future. This is not the problem of time but of approach, structure, and process. NOWPAP lacks the international cooperation needed to evolve structurally as a regime. The issue becomes what should be changed in NOWPAP and how. This article outlines a successful guideline for the development of NOWPAP as a regime, which is now merely an ineffectual arrangement, by analyzing and reviewing lessons from three successful marin environment regimes: the SEAPOL regime, the Mediterranean Sea regime, and the North Sea regime. For this purpose, this research paper is divided into three sections. First, a brief overview of the structure and function of NOWPAP is discussed. Next, NOWPAP is compared to the SEAPOL, MAP and North Sea regimes to allow for the final section's analysis of policy prescriptions to make it a more effective regime. Finally, ten guidelines have been given as the above-mentioned successful regimes' lessons for NOWPAP.영어 초록
NOWPAP is an environmental regime initiated and supported by the UNEP with the purpose of recovering and protecting Northeast Asian seas from pollution, stimulated by the success of programs in the Mediterranean region. Unlike the Mediterranean regime, NOWPAP has not yet achieved anything substantial, nor is likely to do so in the foreseeable future. This is not the problem of time but of approach, structure, and process. NOWPAP lacks the international cooperation needed to evolve structurally as a regime. The issue becomes what should be changed in NOWPAP and how. This article outlines a successful guideline for the development of NOWPAP as a regime, which is now merely an ineffectual arrangement, by analyzing and reviewing lessons from three successful marin environment regimes: the SEAPOL regime, the Mediterranean Sea regime, and the North Sea regime. For this purpose, this research paper is divided into three sections. First, a brief overview of the structure and function of NOWPAP is discussed. Next, NOWPAP is compared to the SEAPOL, MAP and North Sea regimes to allow for the final section's analysis of policy prescriptions to make it a more effective regime. Finally, ten guidelines have been given as the above-mentioned successful regimes' lessons for NOWPAP.참고 자료
없음"21세기정치학회보"의 다른 논문
노동 동원수단의 변화를 통한 북한 김정일체제의 변화 분석20페이지
독일의 통일에 비추어 본 한국의 통일이념과 통일외교노선의 성찰21페이지
부산,울산,경남지역 빈곤층의 정치의식22페이지
기초의원선거에서 유권자의 후보자 선택기준31페이지
정치관계법 개혁의 성격과 내용 : 2004년 개정 정치관계법을 중심으로 25페이지
1980년대 제5공화국 정부의 통화주의 인플레이션 정책의 정치경제 : 영국과 한국에서 상이한 아이디..22페이지
민주화 이후 한국정치의 갈등구조와 전망: 공간이론과 2002년 대통령선거21페이지
동북아시아 지역협력과 APEC의 역할22페이지
동아시아 지역주의 : APEC과 미국20페이지
“테러와의 전쟁”에 대한 비판적 조명24페이지