Cooperation Theory and the Collapse of the 1994 U.S.-DPRK Agreed Framework
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 21세기정치학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 21세기정치학회보 / 15권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : James G. Strohmaier
ㆍ저자명 : James G. Strohmaier
한국어 초록
Since October 2002, the United States and North Korea have been at loggerheads over the how to resolve the issue of the North's mostly clandestine nuclear weapons program, a recent breakthrough in Six-Party Talks not withstanding. During that time, North Korea has dropped out the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), reprocessed 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods that had been monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) since 1994rods that could provide North Korea with enough fissile material for as many as 10 nuclear bombs, and most recently again downloaded the Yongbyon reactor of additional spent fuel that the North could processes into even more material for weapons (Brooke, May 12, 2005). Ironically, for more than eight years prior to this ongoing stalemate, the two countries had been working successfully toward implementing an agreement designed to put the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's (DPRK) plutonium genie back in the bottle. What was the cause of this unfortunate turn of events?....영어 초록
Since October 2002, the United States and North Korea have been at loggerheads over the how to resolve the issue of the North's mostly clandestine nuclear weapons program, a recent breakthrough in Six-Party Talks not withstanding. During that time, North Korea has dropped out the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), reprocessed 8,000 spent nuclear fuel rods that had been monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) since 1994rods that could provide North Korea with enough fissile material for as many as 10 nuclear bombs, and most recently again downloaded the Yongbyon reactor of additional spent fuel that the North could processes into even more material for weapons (Brooke, May 12, 2005). Ironically, for more than eight years prior to this ongoing stalemate, the two countries had been working successfully toward implementing an agreement designed to put the Democratic People's Republic of Korea's (DPRK) plutonium genie back in the bottle. What was the cause of this unfortunate turn of events?....참고 자료
없음"21세기정치학회보"의 다른 논문
북한위협론과 미국 국가안보전략의 재검토19페이지
김정일(金正日)의 정치지도자적 자질과 특성에 관한 연구28페이지
일본의 정부간 관계론 : 의미, 경향성, 그리고 편향성 21페이지
시베리아 횡단철도 : 건설배경과 과정 및 개발정책을 중심으로18페이지
중동평화과정에 대한 유럽연합의 외교안보정책15페이지
에너지 안보관점에서 본 동북아 석유수송로의 지정학적 분석 : 동남아시아 해협 혼란 요인과 영향을 중..27페이지
대만의 정보화 추진과정과 국가역할27페이지
‘지속가능한 발전’ 개념의 현실화를 위한 일고(一考) 20페이지
세계 한민족 Diaspora와 네트워크 구축의 정치경제18페이지
17대 총선과 강원도민의 투표행태 : 보수적 실용주의25페이지