* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국교육공학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 교육공학연구 / 22권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : 송상호, 권경빈
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 미국 대학 교수-학습센터의 역사와 의의
Ⅲ. 요약 및 논의
Ⅳ. 결 론
참 고 문 헌
한국어 초록
본 연구는 교수-학습센터 설립 및 운영을 위하여 기초 자료가 될 수 있도록 교수-학습센터의 필요성과 역할을 정리하고 발전 방향을 탐구하는데 있다. 이를 위해 미국 대학 교수-학습센터의 역사를 고찰하였으며 주요 역할로 교수자원개발, 교육혁신, 프로그램개발, 그리고 교수-학습센터 성과분석을 제시하였다. 또한 국내 교수-학습센터의 설립 현황을 간략히 고찰한 후 국내 대학 교수-학습센터의 발전을 위해 교수자원개발을 위한 기획력 확보, 교수역할 모형 제시, 교수-학습센터 협력관계 형성, 그리고 장기운영을 위한 자금 확보의 네 가지 방향을 제안하였다.
영어 초록
The purpose of this study is to review the role of Center for Teaching and Learning(CTL)and to suggest future directions for the CTL in Korea. CTL was established in US Universitiesin 1962 but mainly from the late 1960's. First, this study reviews the history of CTLs in theUSA. Second, it summarizes four implications from USA CTLs. Third, it reviews current state ofCTLs in Korea, and finally, suggests future directions for CTLs in Korean universities.In the USA, before 1970, each faculty member had his/her responsibility to develope teachingcompetencies. The first CTL in the USA was Center for Research on Learning and Teaching, in1962, at University of Michigan. In the mid-1970's, several funds facilitated the establishment ofCTLs'. Since 1990, university associations such as POD, AAHE, AACU supported CTL in amore organized way.Four main roles of CTL in the USA were faculty development, educational reform, diverseprogram development, and CTL's outcome evaluation. First, faculty development meant facultyrenewal, instructional development, and organizational development. AAHE especially contributed to faculty development in the USA. Second, conceptual framework for institutional change was suggested and many universities focused on educational reform. Third, each CTL developed their unique program for faculty and students. Fourth, assessing accomplishments of CTL was an issue to sustain the CTL.In Korea, the first CTL was established in Inha university. Now, in 2006, 102 CTLs haveformed an association in the Nation. Although each CTL has tried to provide its service, moresystemic approach is necessary.This study suggests four future development dicections for CTLs' in Korea.1. It is necessary to improve systemic competency to plan and support faculty development.2. CTL needs to develope and guide teaching models for the new environment.3. More organized relationship needs to be established among CTLs'4, More fund or monetary support should be secured for the stable management for CTL.Key words: CTL, Center for teaching and learning, faculty development
참고 자료
없음
"교육공학연구"의 다른 논문
더보기 (1/6)