* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국청각언어재활학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 청능재활 / 6권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : 구호림, 김진숙
ㆍ저자명 : 구호림, 김진숙
목차
INTRODUCTIONMATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
영어 초록
For further understanding of the hearing impaired and facilitating hearing rehabilitation in Korea, Korean Evaluation Scale forHearing Handicap (KESHH) was developed to analyze the social and psychological effects of the hearing impairment. The KESHH
was developed with 24 items and 4 subscales including 6 items on each subscale and the KESHH was divided into type-1 and 2
depending on hearing aid users and non hearing aid users. However, the scale had to be standardized for the clinical use and the
purpose of this study was to standardize the KESHH. Data were collected from total 288 participants, 176 hearing aid users (male:
115, female: 61, average age: 60.15 years old) and 112 non-hearing aid users (male: 52, female: 60, average age: 78.79 years old).
For standardization, two methods were used for analysis. One, as utilizing statistical average and standard deviation (SD) number,
the degree of the hearing handicap was categorized. The distribution of the score were 24.00-52.00 (15.6%) for being ‘mild’
handicap lower than -2 SD, 52.01-70.05 (34.7%) for being ‘moderate’ handicap between -2 SD and -1 SD, 70.06-88.01
(34.7%) for being ‘moderately severe’ handicap between -1 SD and +1 SD, 88.02-120 (14.9%) for being ‘severe’ handicap higher
than +2 SD. The other, as utilizing percentile, the categories were divided into 5 classes depending on the degree of the handicap.
Category 1 was set to be up to 20 percentile with the scores being 54.10, category 2 to be up to 40 percentile with the scores being
65.57, category 3 to up to be 60 percentile with the scores being 76.33, category 4 to be up to 80 percentile with the scores being
85.23, and finally category 5 was set up over the 80 percentile. The latter was selected based on the preceding studies and the equal
distribution of the scores. For clinical use, only integral scores were selected for the standardization. Finally, the scores of the
KESHH were divided into 5 categories depending on the degree of the handicap. Category 1 was corresponded to 24-54 points;
category 2, 55-66; category 3, 67-76; category 4, 77-85; and category 5, 86-120, indicating higher points representing higher
handicapping score based on the percentile. It is thought that the suggested standardization of KESHH is clinically useful for identifying
the degrees of the hearing handicaps depending on raw scores.
KEY WORDS:Hearing handicap·Korean evaluation scale for hearing handicap (KESHH)·Standardization
참고 자료
없음"청능재활"의 다른 논문
소음성 난청 대상자의 초소형 고막형 보청기 적합사례 보고5페이지
고막보청기 착용 시 꽉찬적합을 통한 폐쇄효과의 해결 : 사례 보고4페이지
소리자극 특성이 전정유발근전위 잠복기에 미치는 영향5페이지
한국어 단음절과 문장, 영어 문장을 이용한 장기평균어음스펙트럼 비교 연구9페이지
보청기를 착용한 노인의 청능 훈련기간에 따른 단어인지도의 변화5페이지
연령에 따른 변조이음향방사 잠복기에 관한 연구6페이지
Effects of the Target Talker Gender and the Number of C..7페이지
중추청각처리장애의 선별을 위한 아동청각처리능력척도(CHAPPS)에 관한 연구9페이지
P1-N1-P2 Complex and Acoustic Change Complex Elicited b..7페이지
아파트 공동주택의 소음분쟁에 대한 법률적 분석6페이지