Regulation for CB-IB Co-evolution ⁃ Establishing Sound Ownership and Governance Structure ⁃
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 은행법학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 은행법연구 / 4권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : 김동환
ㆍ저자명 : 김동환
목차
"1. Introduction(1) Background of the Study
(2) Object and Contents of the Study
2. Model
(1) Types of CB-IB Consolidation
(2) Basic Assumption
3. Pros and Cons of CI-IB Consolidation
(1) General CIB Case
(2) Complex CIB-1
(3) Complex CIB-2
(4) Remarks
4. Desirable Regulatory Scheme for CB-IB Co-evolution
(1) Basic Direction
(2) Detailed Schemes"
한국어 초록
"This paper studies the pros and cons of a consolidation of commercial banks (henceforth, CB) and investment banks (henceforth, IB), and the regulation scheme that would be desirable for a CB-IB co-evolution in the context of vertical or horizontal integration theory. The consolidation can contribute to expand market dominance or recoup losses among financial groups. But it may be abused as unfair assistances or tunneling methods, which might impairthe fairness and stability of the financial market. Conglomerates of CB and IB should be permitted only if they do not impair the efficiency, fairness, and stability of the financial market. If not, however, an arm's length rule should be applied to the conglomerated financial group, which requires CB and IB to separate. Financial authorities should also consider restricting/prohibiting consolidated tax returns and introducing a double derivative action system to reduce fictitious capital problems in complex consolidation cases which are
characterized by circular investment relationships."
영어 초록
"This paper studies the pros and cons of a consolidation of commercial banks (henceforth, CB) and investment banks (henceforth, IB), and the regulation scheme that would be desirable for a CB-IB co-evolution in the context of vertical or horizontal integration theory. The consolidation can contribute to expand market dominance or recoup losses among financial groups. But it may be abused as unfair assistances or tunneling methods, which might impairthe fairness and stability of the financial market. Conglomerates of CB and IB should be permitted only if they do not impair the efficiency, fairness, and stability of the financial market. If not, however, an arm's length rule should be applied to the conglomerated financial group, which requires CB and IB to separate. Financial authorities should also consider restricting/prohibiting consolidated tax returns and introducing a double derivative action system to reduce fictitious capital problems in complex consolidation cases which arecharacterized by circular investment relationships."참고 자료
없음"은행법연구"의 다른 논문
2011년 상반기 은행거래 관련 주요 판례41페이지
2011년 상반기 주요 금융 관련 법령의 제・개정 동향10페이지
금융규제와 과징금25페이지
투자일임업과 관련한 몇 가지 법적 쟁점29페이지
금융안정 분담금(은행세)의 국내도입과 정책방향22페이지