* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국교육학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 교육학연구 / 14권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : 金南星
ㆍ저자명 : 金南星
목차
1. 自己統制(Self-Control)의 意義2. 自己統制의 戰略
3. 本硏究의 目的
4. 方法
5. 結果
6. 討議
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
영어 초록
The term self-control is used to describe a response repertoire in which an individual can make responses to increase or decrease probability that is perceived as injurious to the individual himself or to others. The cardinal feature of self-control is that it is the person himself who is the agent of his own behavior change. However it is not to mean that all instances of self-control are explained with “soft determinism.” Self-control are ultimately maintained by external variables. The complexity of interacting variables in self-control situations is often overwhelming. In an attempt to sythesize some of the common features found in various forms of self-control, the following tentative definition is proposed: A person displays self-control when in the relative absence of immediate external constrains, he engages in behavior whose previous probability has been less than that of alternatively available behaviors. There are two basic forms of self-control strategies. The first involves environmental planning, where in the individual plans and implements changes in relevant situational factors prior to the execution of a target behavior. The second strategy, called behavioral programming, involves self -administered consequences following the occurence of a target response.This study focused on application of general self-control strategies to rudy behavior modification, A survey of the studies conducted by Harris & Trujillo(l975), Broden, Hall &Mitts(l974), Fox (1962), Richards(l975) and others Jed to the conclusion that self-control procedures were effective to modification of study behavior and some problems were raised as follow: ①Stimulus control was not an effective treatment, ② Subjects of treatment groups consisted of volunteers and that of control groups involunteers, ③ All cases of study were treated in schools of America. From these conclusion and problems, the following hypotheses were derived : ① Effectiveness of self-control procedures would also be applicable to Korean students being influenced by typical Korean school culture, ②Involunteers’ self-control ability would be able to achieve by teacher’s arrangement of stimulus control (admonition), ③ Volunteers’ self-control would be more effective than involuteers’ self-control achieved by teacher’s arrangement of stimulus control in study behavior modification.
The two treatment and one control groups were ① volunteers(N=3) self-monitoring the Programs of Effective Study by Self-Control (PESSC), ② involunteers(N=3) participating in PESSC by teacher’s admonition, ③ involunteers(K=5) being controlled by no-treatment.
Treatments were delivered primarily via typed handouts. The three treatment outcomemeasures were collected after the course final exam. T scores of the course final exam scores of each groups were separately compared with that of the midterm exam scores. All of the hypotheses were supported by the results.
참고 자료
없음태그
"교육학연구"의 다른 논문
農業發展을 위한 社會敎育의 役割12페이지
韓國敎育 革新의 새로운 座標8페이지
發展敎育論의 業績과 課題12페이지
官僚的 學校組織에서의 專門志向 敎師의 葛藤14페이지
敎育方法으로서의 敎化의 性格과 問題10페이지
矩堂 兪吉濬의 敎育思想 硏究11페이지
1948년 이 후 美國의 大學總長들의 學位, 專攻分野, 經歷 등의 變遷考8페이지
特珠學級 運營의 實態 및 問題 分析17페이지
染色體 異常이 犯罪와 精神薄弱에 끼치는 影響20페이지
大學生의 人口意識과 人口敎育에 對한 態度 硏究17페이지