* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국교육학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 교육학연구 / 18권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : 金宗西, 李烘雨
ㆍ저자명 : 金宗西, 李烘雨
목차
Ⅰ. 序論Ⅱ. 운크라 使節團 報告書
Ⅲ. 미국 敎育使節團 報告書
Ⅳ. 브로우디 敎授의 論評과 建議
Ⅴ. 플로리다 硏究調査團 報告書
Ⅵ. 綜合的 考察
〈參考文獻〉
〈ABSTRACT〉
영어 초록
No country is ever free from foreign influences in shaping its educational theory and practice. Admittedly, the Korean education since 1950 provides a notable example in this respect. Of the diverse routes of influences during that period of time, the activities of foreign educational missions to Korea are particularly important, in that their influences have been more systematic and directly geared to policy issues. They were entrusted with more or less specific missions, and they submitted formal reports incorporating their observations and recommendations.Therefore, a critical review of their reports would reveal the actual picture of Korean education as observed by the foreign specialists. The present study is an attempt to get at such picture with specific reference to curriculum and instruction.
In this study, four such reports are analyzed. The first incidence of educational mis¬sion was UNESCO-UNKRA Educational Planning Mission to Korea in 1952-3. Their mission was to comprehensively assess the educational needs of the country right after the Korean War and to propose recommendations for making education more relevant to the Korean society. Of the four successive American Education Teams during a period of ten years from 1952, the third (1954-5) dealt with curriculum and instruction. The mission of the Team, as specified in their report, Curriculum Handbook for the Schools of Korea, was to introduce the “experience curriculum” to Korea and to provide general guidelines for its implementation. Professor B.S. Broudy, working as a curriculum specialist of the advisory group to the long-range educational planning initiated by the Korean government in 1969, submitted his “Comments and Recommendations for Curriculum and Instruction.” And finally in 1971, a research and development team from Florida State University was invited to Korea to propose an innovative instructional system for the Korean schools.
One outstanding conclusion from the review of the above four reports is that they provided the Koreans with a language by means of which the Koreans could grasp their educational realities. The most important part of the language is that education should be relevant to everyday life and needs of the society. This language still has a strong hold on the way the Koreans look at and discuss the problems of education, possibly leading their eyes away from the intrinsic value that the school subjects might have.
It seems natural that the foreign specialists had recourse to their own theories or preconceptions in their observations. This means that the language the Koreans are currently using to grasp their realities is largely borrowed from abroad. If it is important for the Koreans to have “their own eyes” to look at Korean education, as is increasingly emphasized recently, the above point is interpreted to raise a problem of defining the “Koreans’ Own eyes.” This problem needs to be clarified before the assertion for the “Korean theory of education” can have any substantial meaning.
참고 자료
없음태그
"교육학연구"의 다른 논문
- 敎育硏究를 위한 模型으로서의 機能理論과 葛藤理論14페이지
- 民主主義 理念에 照明한 天園 吳天錫의 敎育思想6페이지
- 授業現場의 敎育과 民主主義20페이지
- 민주주의, 진보주의 교육, 교육의 인간화8페이지
- 道德敎育의 敎育學的 意味17페이지
- Dewey 思想에 있어서의 民主主義와 敎育12페이지
- 發展韓國의 基本課業과 敎育의 指導理念14페이지