학교교육목표의 구성요인과 교사의 지각수준에 관한 연구
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국교육학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 교육학연구 / 29권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : 권요한, 문열생
ㆍ저자명 : 권요한, 문열생
목차
Ⅰ. 서론Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
Ⅲ. 연구방법
Ⅳ. 연구결과
Ⅴ. 논의
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
영어 초록
This syudy is intended for the purpose of examining the relationship between source and process in establishing educational objectives by analyzing constituent factors of the established objectives, and of finding out elementary and junior-high school teachers' perceptional level as to how important the objectives are and how efficiently they can be carried out.For this study, we collected educational plans of different schools and sent our questionnaires. We used these data from teachers and classified them into male group and female group, elementary and junior-high school, and public and private school respectively.
The method of this study is to find out constituent items by analyzing school educational objectives fixed by the curriculum consultative committee.
Each teachers' group accepted differently concerning what procedures are picked up to establish educational objectives, what sources are used to lay them out, and how many teachers participate in the procedure. These differences could be identified by means of percentage.
By way of percentage, we also found out the differences of perceptional levels, those of practicabilities, and the importance of teacher's factor in selecting educational objectives. And through CR verification, we could obtain the difference between elementary school group and junior-high school group.
The results of this study are as follows.
First, the constituent items of school educational objectives are bound to the policy of the Ministry of Education, or subjected to that of a local board of education, so that they may not be suitable to the specific needs of each schools and communities.
Second, characteristics of the educational objectives are not specific, partly because few teachers tend to take part in formulation of the objectives, and partly because the specific factors of a region and the students there are not fully considered. tions about whether one objective is practicable or not are greatly different. The reason is that school education programs and curriculum sources are forcedly based on the policy of the government.
Fourth, an item of highest importance, of highest perception, and of most practicability among the school objectives is the 'scholatic ability' factor. This shows that teacher's in schools put extremely biased emphasis on the knowledge transmission.
Fifth, the righteous view of value is an item shown a meaningful difference among the school educational objectives both in elementary and in junior-high school:/The higher grade the students are in, the fewer have the faithful view of value. The reason can be understood that deficent is more suitable, systematic and specific education in harmony with the students' school year.
참고 자료
없음태그
"교육학연구"의 다른 논문
대학 교육기회의 확대에 따른 대학의 분화와 교육기회의 불평등에 관한 연구16페이지
大學에서의 中途退學 原因과 그 抑制方案15페이지
學歷社會化 理論의 批判的 考察12페이지
루소의 敎育理論16페이지
한국 대학생의 도덕사태 개념화 및 그 변화과정에 관한 연구18페이지
孝와 敎育25페이지
敎育思潮面에서 본 敎育課程의 統合13페이지
현행 지식교육의 문제점과 대안 탐색17페이지
‘교육과정 문제의 불확실성’에 대한 이해21페이지
社會敎育과 敎育學敎育17페이지