敎育의 質的 高度化를 위한 思考力 增進 方案 硏究
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국교육학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 교육학연구 / 30권 / 4호
ㆍ저자명 : 李星珍, 金永錫, 任眞永, 李相喜, 權敏哲
ㆍ저자명 : 李星珍, 金永錫, 任眞永, 李相喜, 權敏哲
목차
Ⅰ. 緖論Ⅱ. 思考力 增進을 위한 思考力 槪念 模型
Ⅲ. 實驗硏究
Ⅳ. 論議
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
영어 초록
The present study was (1) to analyze the existing literature pertaining to thinking processes, (2) to develop a conceptual model for training thinking abilities, and (3) to design programs for promoting thinking abilities. In this study, thinking process was dichotomized to include centripetal and centrifugal thinking. The centripetal thinking was defined as the capacity of working memory and automatized thinking process which efficiently utilizes it. The centrifugal thinking includes ability for formulating problems, challenging assumptions, and generating alternatives.Two thinking ability development programs - one for centripetal and the other centrifugal - were developed to be implemented in 12 sessions each taking 40 minutes, and administered to the 6th grade students. The number of subjects of centripetal thinking program was 225(experimental group 109, control group 116), and that of centrifugal program was 224(experimental group 108, control group 116). The General Intelligence Test (Chung & Kim, 1990) was administered as pre- and post-test for the former, and the Creativity Test Short Form(Lee & Chung, 1989) for the latter. After two months, Centripetal Thinking Test and Centrifugal Thinking Test were administered as retention tests for each group.
In the centripetal thinking program, statistically significant difference of increment was found only in numerical reasoning(p<.05), while in word usage, verbal reasoning, arithmetic reasoning, figure reasoning, there were no differences. This result indicates that the program was not domain-specific. In retention test, statistically significant difference was also found only in numerical reasoning(p<.01), while in sentence linkage, logical reasoning, verbal reasoning, argumentating and discriminating arguments and their bases, no differences were found. The reasons for the failure in obtaining expected result were the brevity of training sessions for developing automatizing thinking and the possiblity that students' partly successful strategy had hindered the learning of new strategies.
In the centrifugal thinking program, statistically significant difference of increment was shown in total creativity score(p<.01) and f1uency(p<.001), while in flexibility, originality, openness, there were no differences. What was intended in this program was not the automatization of thinking but change in attitudes or viewpoints, the latter being relatively easier to come about. That is, change in attitudes or viewpoint needs less time than automatization. In retention test, statistically significant difference was found in generating alternatives(p<.01) and challenging assumptions(p<.05). But in formulating problems, the control group was found to perform better than experimental group (p<.05). The fact that the fluency in the formulating problems of control group was higher than that of experimental group, while the fluency in generating alternatives of experimental group was higher than that of control group, was taken as evidence that as a result of the training the experimental group took the test too deliberately utilizing elaboration strategies.
These results indicate that working memory and automatization processes are not domain-specific but content-free, supporting the automatization theory, working memory and parallel processing models.
It was concluded that an extra-curricular thinking skills development program could be helpful for developing thinking abilities but as one study shows(e.g. Lee et al., 1992), other factors such as family environment, everyday experiences, institutional infrastructure(e.g. classroom structure, teacher, etc.) are no less important than the program itself in promoting students' thinking abilities.
참고 자료
없음태그
"교육학연구"의 다른 논문
전래동화에 나타난 ‘삶’의 교육적 의미11페이지
Freire의 교육개혁 방법에 대한 평가14페이지
社會敎育에 있어서의 自己主導學習理論과 韓國敎育改善에의 示唆15페이지
IQ와 ADHD에 관련된 학습장애의 정의문제9페이지
유아의 글자 환경과 읽기에 관한 연구15페이지
특수교육의 범주적 對 비범주적 접근 間 비교분석17페이지
학부모의 교육열25페이지
敎授效果 評價를 위한 準據體制 探索 硏究16페이지
미군정기간중 미국의 한국에 대한 교육정책17페이지
朝鮮前期 成均館의 館生敎授19페이지