* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 동국사학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 동국사학 / 37권
ㆍ저자명 : 徐榮敎
ㆍ저자명 : 徐榮敎
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말Ⅱ. 鐵戈의 名稱에 대한 재검토
Ⅲ. 鉤形 槍의 用途
Ⅳ. 맺음말- 鉤形 槍과 侍衛府·皆知戟幢
영어 초록
The reason why I interpret this way is that pikeman is a special infantry army organized when cavalry is absolutely numerically inferior. It is confirmed by Han, Tang and Sung of China, and Rome in the West, and it is also seen in infantry armies of England, Scotland, Flanders and Switzerland J. F. Verburggen, renowned Belgian historian of warfare, stated that pike was a basic weapon for infantry to use in battles against cavalry. He stated that pike was long and heavy and its point was thick, which was appropriate for planting its end in the ground, When heavy horses rushed toward infantry soldiers, pikes, unless being planted in the ground, would have been pushed out by the rushing forces of horses, which would have fatally injured infantry soldiers. Consequently, two soldiers were required to hold one pike, with one planting its end in the ground and the other holding it at a certain angle. Pike infantry arrangement was taken at the confluence of rivers and against the rivers, or crown-shaped circular formation was taken in the plains without any obstacles. It was to avoid attacks from the flank and the back. Pikes aimed at horses' hearts or necks, not soldiers on the horses. In other words, the main purpose of pikes was to drop soldiers off the leading horses and stop the movement of the whole cavalry anny. The stopped cavalry army was nothing but a disable thing without mobility. The cavalry anny would be so congested like a traffic jam that they could not use weapons at their disposals, and consequently, they would be fatal when attacked by pike infantry.참고 자료
없음"동국사학"의 다른 논문
- 미국 팽창주의 사상의 이념적 계승17페이지
- 잭슨시대 내륙개발정책과 주권논의21페이지
- 중세 영국 농지제의 용어 사용 문제22페이지
- 地藏道場 慈風長春 - 多彩的九華山民俗風情7페이지
- 中國國民黨 3全大會의 再評價24페이지
- 劉師培의 顔元 戴震 學術觀28페이지
- 明淸時期中國鄕村社會中宗族義田的發展36페이지
- 明末 · 淸初 時期의 寶卷文學에 대하여23페이지
- 佛敎의 知와 陽明學의 知25페이지
- 조선 관인의 눈에 비친 중국의 강남24페이지