복압성 요실금 여성에게 시행한 두 가지 방법의 골반저근육훈련의 효과
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 노인간호학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 노인간호학회지 / 1권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : 최영희, 성명숙, 백성희
ㆍ저자명 : 최영희, 성명숙, 백성희
목차
Ⅰ. 서론Ⅱ. 문헌 고찰
Ⅲ. 연구 방법
Ⅳ. 연구 결과
Ⅴ. 논의
Ⅵ. 결론 및 제언
참고 문헌
Abstract
영어 초록
Purposes : We aimed to compare the treatment efficacy of pelvic floor muscle exercises and the functional electrical stimulation (FES)-biofeedback method, which are being widely used as a conservative treatment method for urinary incontinence in women. We also aimed to determine the effects of those treatments on the patients' quality of life.Materials and methods : We randomly selected 90 female incontinence patients who visited our department and evenly divided them into three groups: control group, pelvic floor muscle (PFM) exercise group, FES-biofeedback group. They were treated for 6 weeks. The objective changes in the severity of incontinence and discomfort in daily and social life were measured using a translated version of the questionnaire by Jackson( Bristol Female Urinary Symptom Questionnaire). Subjective changes of pelvic muscle contraction force were measured by perineometer.
Results : Pre and post treatment maximal pelvic floor muscle contractile pressure (PMC pressure) among the three groups (control, PFM exercise, FES-biofeedback) showed statistically significant differences(p=0.000). Especially, The FES-biofeedback group showed significantly increased maximal PMC pressure compared with other groups(p<0.001). When measured by the questionnaire, pre and post treatment changes in the severity of urinary incontinence and discomfort due to incontinence showed significant differences among the three groups, and FES-biofeedback group showed a significant decrease (p< 0.001). The level of discomfort in daily life, social activity, physical activity, personal relations and discomfort due to urinary symptoms was greatly changed. FES-biofeedback group, in particular, showed a significant decrease in discomfort after treatment.
Conclusion : When PFM exercise and FES-biofeedback were compared in terms of their effects on the patients' quality of life, FES-biofeedback proved more effective than the verbal explanation of the PFM exercises or simple PFM exercises.
참고 자료
없음"노인간호학회지"의 다른 논문
노인돌봄 행위의 전승에 관한 문화기술적 연구 30페이지
우리나라 치매노인 복지에 관한 고찰 10페이지
사회적 노화이론에 대한 고찰12페이지
도시 빈곤 여성노인에 대한 임종시 돌봄13페이지
와상 노인환자 간호제공자의 부담감과 삶의 질과의 관계13페이지