* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 서울대학교 기술과법센터
ㆍ수록지정보 : LAW & TECHNOLOGY / 1권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : 임원선
ㆍ저자명 : 임원선
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가면서Ⅱ. 기술조치의 법적 보호와 관련한 쟁점의 검토
Ⅲ. DRM의 저작권법적 보호 현황
Ⅳ. 결 론
영어 초록
In the digital network environment, the copyright holders are increasingly resorting to technological measures to protect their rights in their works or other subject matters, in lieu of legal protection and legal remedies with that copyright law provided. However, even though the technological protection measures are becoming highly sophisticated, all the measures could be eventually defeated by technically sophisticated users or even the ordinary users with the aids of some circumvention devices or the skilled persons. Most of the delegations, gathered in Geneva, Switzerland in December 1996, recognized this problem and lastly agreed to introduce some protection to the technological measures for protecting copyright and neighbouring rights. There are two main issues with the protection of the technological measures. One is whether the access control measures are to be the subject matter of this protection, and another is how we can maintain the exceptions and limitations to the copyright intact, though the application and legal protection of the technological measures. On this issue of the needs of access control power, there seem to be and can be lots of pros and cons. Thus it is at present not proper to say that the introduction of access right or use right is appropriate or not. And, we can say clearly that we have never decided that kind of decision yet. That kind of control power must be given through the same way that the rights, authors already have, were given to them. It is clearly not through the back door, i.e. the provision of the protection of the technological measures. Technologies hear only the voice of their master and are blind to the purpose of using the works. Even though there is no legal protection, ordinary people cannot circumvent the technological measures for legitimate exploitation of a work. Using this situation, the right holders could extend their control over the boundaries of copyright. Without appropriate measures for preserving the room for the exceptions and limitations to the copyright, the liberty of users will be choked with the application and legal protection of the technological measures. If we want to preserve delicate balance on copyright regime, we have to review the impact of the application and legal protection of the technological measures, and take a appropriate measures for preserving the room for the exceptions and limitations to the copyright. If we are negligent to do so, we would fail to get the ultimate goal of sustainable development of culture and economy.참고 자료
없음태그
"LAW & TECHNOLOGY"의 다른 논문
- WTO 온라인도박서비스 사건 -WT/DS285/R, WT/DS285/AB/R-4페이지
- 독일 : 오픈소스 라이선스의 유효성 -뮌헨 지방법원 2004년 5월 19일-5페이지
- 업무표장 및 서비스표의 식별력 -서울중앙지방법원 2005. 3. 24. 선고 2994가합600 판결..6페이지
- 퍼블리시티권의 인정 여부-서울중앙지방법원 2004. 12. 10. 선고 2004가합16025 판결-..11페이지
- 국내 케이블 TV PP 산업의 구조와 문제점14페이지
- 현행법상 방송 및 통신시장의 규제와 방송•통신의 융합에 따른 공정경쟁 이슈 - 인터넷방송을 중심으로15페이지
- 온라인 음악산업의 법적 문제21페이지
- DRM 기술표준의 정책적 과제14페이지
- 프라이버시 보호를 위한 DRM기술 리엔지니어링14페이지
- DRM 기술과 산업의 현황과 과제8페이지