여성 만성 경통 환자에 대한 등척성 운동과 안정화 운동치료의 효과 비교
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2016.04.01
- 최종 저작일
- 2008.05
- 10페이지/
어도비 PDF
- 가격 4,000원
![할인쿠폰받기](/images/v4/document/ico_det_coupon.gif)
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국전문물리치료학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 한국전문물리치료학회지 / 15권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : 오덕원, 김선엽
영어 초록
This study compared the effect of therapeutic exercise with conservative treatment in women with chronic neck pain. Subjects were allocated to control, neck isometric exercise, and cervical stabilization exercise groups consisting of 29, 32, and 31 patients, respectively. The conservative treatment for the control group consisted of hot packs, ultrasound, interferential current therapy, and intermittent cervical traction. The neck isometric exercise group performed a neck isometric exercise and the cervical stabilization exercise group performed a cervical stabilization exercise. To compare the three groups, the levels of perceived pain, neck disability, and psychological depression were assessed on admission, at discharge, and one month after discharge. On admission and at discharge, the pain and neck disability scores did not differ significantly among the groups. However, one month after discharge, both the neck isometric and cervical stabilization exercise groups had significantly improved perceived pain levels as compared to control (p<.05). The improvement in the degree of neck disability was most significant in the cervical stabilization exercise group (p<.05). On comparing the changes in the variables at the three assessments for each group, there was a significant difference between the control and cervical stabilization exercise groups (p<.05). The findings indicate that therapeutic exercises, especially cervical stabilization exercises, are more effective for improving pain and neck disability than conservative treatment.
참고 자료
없음
"한국전문물리치료학회지"의 다른 논문
더보기 (3/8)