초기 한국교회 개척방법론으로서의 네비우스 정책과 평가
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국선교신학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 선교신학 / 34권
ㆍ저자명 : 최동규
ㆍ저자명 : 최동규
영어 초록
The early Korean church had experienced rapid growth and revival. What caused this phenomenon? What are its driving forces? Though so far there have been many papers on the quantitative growth of the Korean church, there are almost none which deals with it from the perspective of church planting. Therefore, in this paper, I tried to evaluate the Nevius Plan as a church planting theory that enabled the early Korean church to grow rapidly. As a result of this study, I found that the Nevius Plan as a church planting method has some strengths and weaknesses.The Nevius Plan is positive in that it enhances greatly the spontaneity of believers on the basis of Three-self Principle─self-support, self-governance, and self-propaganda. However, it is not an absolute principle that can unconditionally be applied in every condition. In addition, it is wrong to place the responsibility of evangelism and church planting on only native people. Such interpretation is a distortion of the Nevius Plan. This would be demonstrated by the supportive argument that when considering Adams Evangelistic Fund, the Nevius Plan did not collide with strategic fund supports. When the Nevius Plan based on Three-self Principle was introduced to missionaries in Korea, it was indigenized into a church planting method focused on self-support and self-propaganda. As a church planting theory, it regarded the church as an organic community full of vitality and pursued establishing indigenous churches in their own culture. Three-self Principle functioned as a concrete method for church planting. However, it should not be recognized as an end in itself or an absolute theory, rather it should be applied appropriately in a certain circumstance in which local churches existed. In his writing, John Nevius also agrees that supporting fund should be invested to several ministries such as school, and to hire paid workers in case of need. Therefore, to believe that the Nevius Plan insists on leaving the responsibility of evangelism and church planting to native people without any outer fund, is a distorted interpretation. As the Nevius Plan was applied all over the country, Adams Evangelistic Fund, which had a marked effect on church planting ministry in Taegu area, demonstrates how the Nevius Plan as a indigenous church planting theory could be harmonized with fund support. Three-self Principle is the important foundation for indigenous church planting. The Nevius Plan makes church planting not a humanistic enterprise but a dynamic work led by the Holy Spirit. On the other hand, if funds in the strategic church planting support workers devoted to the Three-self spirit, it will heighten the intensity of effect more than the case of when everything is left to only native people will. It is of course that beneficiaries’ sense of independence is necessary in this case.참고 자료
없음태그
"선교신학"의 다른 논문
한국교회의 태국선교 ―역사, 특징과 과제, 선교신학적 쟁점38페이지
존 로스 선교사의 선교신학 입장으로서 성취신학 연구30페이지
로잔세계복음화운동에 나타난 주요 선교신학적 주제들의 고찰 ― 로잔언약, 마닐라선언, 캐이프타운 헌신..41페이지
터키 거주 한국 선교사 자녀들의 모국어 숙달도에 관여하는 변인 연구35페이지
샬롬의 관점에서의 통일선교28페이지
죄인들의 교회, 갱신하는 교회, 그리고 일치하는 교회 ― 비셔트 후프트의 선교신학28페이지
하나님나라와 하나님나라 전도 ―하워드 스나이더의 이론을 중심으로25페이지
선교 상황화 전략과 중앙아시아 –민족별 동질성과 이질성의 문화 접근42페이지
소셜네트워크(SNS) 문화와 N세대 선교 전략32페이지
한국에서 선교적 교회의 사례와 그 기준지표에 대한 고찰25페이지