한국과 파키스탄의 농촌개발 타임라인 분석: 파키스탄에 주는 교훈
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국국제농업개발학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 한국국제농업개발학회지 / 26권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : Babar Shahbaz, Muhammad Luqman, Gyoung-Rae Cho
ㆍ저자명 : Babar Shahbaz, Muhammad Luqman, Gyoung-Rae Cho
목차
ABSTRACTTHEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
KOREA AND PAKISTAN: AN OVERVIEW
RURAL DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE
ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
REFERENCES
영어 초록
The main objective of this paper is to sequentially analyze the major themes in rural devel-opment by taking the case studies of Pakistan and Korea using the framework proposed by Ellis andBiggs. The data presented in this paper is based on an intensive review of literature and in-depth inter-views with some key persons from different organizations in the Republic of Korea. It indicates that atthe time of independence, both countries had weak industrial base and the economy was largely depen-dent on agriculture. Agricultural development remained the main focus of Pakistan’s development poli-cies since independence; however, it was not until early 1970s when development of agriculture and ruralareas became the priority of Korean government. Though many development projects have also beenimplemented in Pakistan since its independence, inconsistent policies adopted by different politicalregimes is one of the main reasons for comparatively poor performance in agriculture and rural devel-opment sectors while the Korean government and policy makers have quickly responded to differentchallenges that emerged from time to time. It seems that Korean government is taking necessary mea-sures to diversify the rural economy through the promotion of agricultural value addition, rural tourismand improved marketing infrastructure to meet new challenges, along with the commendable efforts ofits research and extension organizations; however the response of Pakistan seems rather sluggish in thisrespect. The concluding argument is that though contextual, cultural and socio-economic differencesmay be taken into account while comparing the development history of different countries, developingcountries can learn substantially from the experiences of a developed country in some particular sector,notably in the problem solving approach, integrated strategy, agricultural value addition, strengtheningof local governments, livelihood diversification in rural areas, effective linkages between different orga-nizations and emphasis on sustainable livelihoods.참고 자료
없음"한국국제농업개발학회지"의 다른 논문
HPPD 저해 제초제들에 대한 통일형벼 품종의 약해 반응6페이지
GM 작물의 내건성 검정과 위해성 평가를 위한 가뭄모의시설7페이지
유전자변형생물체(Living Modified Organisms, LMOs)의 자연생태계 위해성 평가..6페이지
박주가리과 식물(백수오, 이엽우피소, 박주가리) 생장의 경시적 변화5페이지
간척지 유리온실에서 LED보광에 따른 착색단고추 생육 특성5페이지
한국 유채 6 품종의 개화기 침수처리에 따른 습해반응 분석8페이지
접종 방법에 따른 고추 역병 저항성의 유전 양식5페이지
무경운답에서 돈분액비 처리에 따른 트리티케일의 생육, 수량 및 토양의 화학적 특성5페이지
신간척지에서 총체사료용 벼 주요 품종의 담수직파 적응성에 관한 연구4페이지
종자수명에 영향을 미치는 벼 유전자원의 형태적 ·생태적 특성7페이지