근세 일본의 김성일 인식에 대하여

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 경상대학교 남명학연구소 ㆍ수록지정보 : 남명학연구 / 41권
ㆍ저자명 : 김시덕

한국어 초록

17-19세기 일본에서는 임진왜란에 대한 정보를 수집하고 정리하는 노력 이 지속되었으며, 전쟁 상대국이었던 조선과 명의 문헌도 수집 정리 대상에 포함되었다. 근세 일본에서 임진왜란 문헌군이 형성될 때 가장 큰 영향을 미 친 외국 문헌은 명나라의 「양조평양록」과 조선의 「징비록」이었으며, 그 밖 의 문헌들은 상대적으로 이용되는 비중이 낮았다. 이 논문은 이상과 같은 전 제에서, 김성일의 저작인

영어 초록

During 17th and 19th century, Japanese intellectuals have strived to collect documents on Imjin War or Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s invasion of Korea and reorganize informations from those books. Books written in Joseon and Ming dynasties were also the object of collecting for the work. Liang chao ping rang lu 兩朝平攘錄 of Ming and Jingbirok 懲毖錄 of Joseon were the most influential books when the discourse of Imjin War was formed in early modern Japan. Other books of Ming and Joseon were also addressed in Japan but used as frequently as these two books as the source. On the basis of the fact, this paper investigated how Haesarok 海槎錄 and Hakbong Seonsaeng Munjip 鶴峯先生文集 written by KIM Seongil were used as a source and how KIM Seongil himself was judged in Japan, especially in Tsushima. According to my investigation, the version of Haesarok flowed in Tsushima was that of contained in first-printed Hakbong Seonsaeng Munjip. And the fact was also revealed that people in Tsushima and mainland Japan had thought KIM Seongil as nasty person and contempted korean delegation in 1590 as tributary one but, after Jingbirok was addressed in late 17th, people in mainland Japan have changed such image of him and become to recognize him as loyalist

참고 자료

없음