Pluralism or Cosmopolitanism? Reflections on Petersmann’s International Economic Law Constitutionalism in the Context of China
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 이준국제법연구원
ㆍ수록지정보 : China and WTO Review / 4권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : Tao Li, Zuoli Jiang
ㆍ저자명 : Tao Li, Zuoli Jiang
목차
1. Introduction2. Human Rights
A. Human Rights as a Foundation of Petersmann’s IEL ConstitutionalizationTheory
B. Human Rights in Chinese Thought
C. Evolution of Free Trade Right in China as an Illustration of Human RightsDevelopment
3. Principles of Justice
A. Petersmann’s Theory of Justice for IEL
B. Social Justice in Chinese Thought
C. Social Justice Practiced in China
4. Judicial Protection of Individual Rights
A. Multilevel Judicial Protection of Individual Rights in IEL as Designed byPetersmann
B. A Comparison from the Perspective of Chinese Judicial Thought andPractice
5. Value Divergence: Evaluation of Petersmann’sTheory from a Chinese Perspective
6. Conclusion
References
영어 초록
Professor Petersmann has developed a constitutionalization theory for IEL based on Western constitutionalism theory in conjunction with human rights law. However, there is a paradox in his theory considering that he stresses ‘legal pluralism’ on the one hand, while calling for a cosmopolitan conception of IEL on the other hand. The hypothesis of this paper is that there are no ‘universalizable’ principles and common constitutional principles that can guarantee the compatibility between the two. Petersmann’s three often-used keywords, ‘human rights,’ “principles of justice,” and “judicial protection of individual rights,” are clarified in the context of Chinese thought and China’s progressive integration into the world economy. This paper finds that Petersmann’s theory focuses on bottom-up individual struggles, whereas Chinese thought is characterized by top-down overall consideration. The value divergence between the goodness of human nature in Chinese thought and the evil of human nature in Western thought makes ‘legal pluralism’ an insurmountable obstacle to a cosmopolitan conception of IEL.참고 자료
없음태그
"China and WTO Review"의 다른 논문
- China’s Intellectual Property Rights Commitments in the..28페이지
- Why Are There So Few Investor-State Arbitrations in Chi..31페이지
- Is Big Data a Big Dilemma or a Big Opportunity in China..26페이지
- The Advantages and Disadvantages of Mediation in the Ch..16페이지
- Trump’s Year-One Trade Policies: Belligerent Rhetoric -..11페이지
- China’s New Diplomatic Relations with Panama: Prospect ..11페이지
- Enforcement of Foreign Awards among the Silk Road Count..10페이지
- China’s Free Trade Agreements under Negotiations7페이지
- China’s Position on USCC 2017 Report: Are You Done?5페이지
- Toward a Trade War between China and the United State? ..4페이지