Reasonable Restrictions on Freedom of High Seas by “Marine Protected Areas on the High Seas”: An Empirical Research
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 이준국제법연구원
ㆍ수록지정보 : Journal of East Asia and International Law / 12권 / 2호
ㆍ저자명 : Yong Wang
ㆍ저자명 : Yong Wang
목차
I. IntroductionII. An Overview of the Principle of the High SeasFreedom and Its Reasonable Restrictions
III. Major Controversies Arising from ReasonableRestrictions on the Principle of the High SeasFreedoms during BBNJ Negotiations
IV. A Positivist Analysis on Reasonable Restriction tothe High Seas Freedoms under the High Seas MPAs
A. Main Management Measures of the Four High Seas MPAs forthe Contracting Parties
B. Management Measures of the Four High Seas MPAs for NoncontractingParties
C. The Jurisdiction Regime of the Four High Seas MPAs over IllegalShips
V. General Ideas Restricting the High SeasFreedoms by the MPAs
A. Reality and Graduality
B. Positive Law
C. Legal Objectivity
VI. Details for the Reasonable Restrictionson the High Seas Freedoms
A. The Management Measures of the High Seas MPAs without theObligations on Non-Contracting Parties
B. The Management Measures of High Seas MPAs under the Rightto Visit and the Long-arm Jurisdiction
C. Soft Law and Exception Rules
VII. Conclusion
영어 초록
The UN member states have been consulting on the establishment of high seas MPAs under the BBNJ Agreement since December 2017.This issue brings about the potential conflicts between the jurisdiction of the high seas MPAs and the traditional freedom of the high seas. Although it is generally accepted that the freedom of the high seas can be reasonably restricted, it is acknowledged that there are great controversies among States on the specific forms, approaches and applicable scopes of the restrictions of the high seas freedoms by the high seas MPAs. At present, there are four recognized high seas MPAs in the world. The practice of these four MPAs contributes positively to the interpretation of the reasonable restrictions on the freedom of the high seas. Accordingly, this paper concludes that the international community should gradually carry forward future restrictions on the freedom of the high seas with some suggestions.참고 자료
없음태그
"Journal of East Asia and International Law"의 다른 논문
Conflict of Laws in Cross-Strait Air Transport: Issues ..22페이지
Obligation to Exchange Views under Article 283 of the U..16페이지
Regulator-led Resolution in Mass Finance Mis-selling: I..16페이지
Japan’s Measures on Export Control to the Republic of K..16페이지
Who Violated International Law? Critical Analysis of Ab..20페이지