Are the PRC BITs Applicable to China’s Special Administrative Regions? In Consideration of the Sanum v. Laos case
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2023.04.03
- 최종 저작일
- 2016.03
- 18페이지/
어도비 PDF
- 가격 5,200원
![할인쿠폰받기](/images/v4/document/ico_det_coupon.gif)
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 이준국제법연구원
ㆍ수록지정보 : China and WTO Review / 2권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : Qianwen Zhang
목차
1. Introduction
2. Sanum v. Laos
A. Overview
B. Award of the Tribunal (PCA Case No. 2013-13)
C. Award of Singapore High Court (Case No. [2015] SGHC 15)
3. Comments on the PCA’s Holding
4. Comments on Singapore High Court’s Holding
A. The Adduction of Further Evidence
B. The 1999 Note to the UN Secretary-General
C. The 2001 WTO Trade Policy Report
5. Conclusion
References
영어 초록
After Tza Yap Shum v. Peru, the case of Sanum v. Laos, brought by a Macanese investor, reattracted public attention to the critical issue of the applicability of the People’s Republic of China Bilateral Investment Treaties in China’s Special Administrative Regions. The Permanent Court of Arbitration held the PRC-Laos BIT extends to Macao according to the purpose and context of the BIT, but its reasoning is not tenable as its logic is flawed. In comparison, in the appeal, the conclusion reached by the Singapore High Court seems plausible, but there are still queries to the Court’s admission of further evidence. The author argues that the PRC BITs are not applicable to Macao and Hong Kong, on the basis of analyzing the treaty interpretation methodologies of this case. Notwithstanding the fact that the final award has not been rendered as of now, the Sanum v. Laos Case carries significant meaning to investment protection in China’s SARs.
참고 자료
없음
"China and WTO Review"의 다른 논문
더보기 (1/6)