9.12 경주지진 및 11.15 포항지진의 구조손상 포텐셜 비교연구
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국지진공학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : Jorunal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea / 22권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : 이철호, 김성용, 박지훈, 김동관, 김태진, 박경훈
ㆍ저자명 : 이철호, 김성용, 박지훈, 김동관, 김태진, 박경훈
목차
A B S T R A C T1. 서 론
2. 포항지진 계측 가속도기록 분석
3. 동일연성도스펙트럼 및 해외 강진과의 비교
3.1. 입력지진파 분석
3.2. 동일연성도스펙트럼 비교분석
3.3. 손상 포텐셜 비교연구
4. PHA2 관측소 지반의 영향
5. 포항지진에 의한 저층 필로티 구조물의 지진응답 사례해석
6. 결 어
REFERENCES
영어 초록
In this paper, comparative analysis of the 9.12 Gyeongju and 11.15 Pohang earthquakes was conducted in order to provide probable explanations and reasons for the damage observed in the 11.15 Pohang earthquake from both earthquake and structural engineering perspectives. The damage potentials like Arias intensity, effective peak ground acceleration, etc observed in the 11.15 Pohang earthquake were generally weaker than those of the 9.12 Gyeongju earthquake. However, in contrast to the high-frequency dominant nature of the 9.12 Gyeongju earthquake records, the spectral power of PHA2 record observed in the soft soil site was highly concentrated around 2Hz. The base shear around 2 Hz frequency was as high as 40% building weight. This frequency band is very close to the fundamental frequency of the piloti-type buildings severely damaged in the northern part of Pohang. Unfortunately, in addition to inherent vertical irregularity, most of the damaged piloti-type buildings had plan irregularity as well and were non-seismic. All these contributed to the fatal damage. Inelastic dynamic analysis indicated that PHA2 record demands system ductility capacity of 3.5 for a structure with a fundamental period of 0.5 sec and yield base shear strength of 10% building weight. The system ductility level of 3.5 seems very difficult to be achievable in non-seismic brittle piloti-type buildings. The soil profile of the PHA2 site was inversely estimated based on deconvolution technique and trial-error procedure with utilizing available records measured at several rock sites during the 11.15 Pohang earthquake. The soil profile estimated was very typical of soil class D, implying significant soil amplification in the 11.15 Pohang earthquake. The 11.15 Pohang earthquake gave us the expensive lesson that near-collapse damage to irregular and brittle buildings is highly possible when soil is soft and epicenter is close, although the earthquake magnitude is just minor to moderate (M 5+).참고 자료
없음태그
"Jorunal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea"의 다른 논문
지진시나리오 기반의 포항지역 액상화위험도 작성 연구6페이지
2017년 포항지진으로 인하여 발생된 최대지반가속도 (PGA) 예측7페이지
SMIT를 활용한 지진하중을 받는 전단 구조물의 응답모드 특성에 관한 연구10페이지
포항 지진과 일본 지진관리 업무 비교·분석7페이지
11.15 지진 사례를 통한 지진피해 시설물 위험도 평가 체계 개선7페이지
포항지진 발생 주변지역 지질특성에 따른 저수지 취약성 해석6페이지
2017년 포항지진으로 피해를 입은 국내 필로티형 건물의 지진 거동8페이지
국내 발생지진에 의한 물류창고 강재 적재설비의 내진성능 평가12페이지
댐 취수탑 3차원 내진안전성 평가에서의 동수압 적용방 법에 관한 연구9페이지
2017년 포항지진 스펙트럼과 한국표준설계스펙트럼의 비교9페이지