세계교정이념의 흐름과 한국교정 -포스트모더니즘 범죄학이론을 중심으로-
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국교정학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 矯正硏究 / 21권
ㆍ저자명 : 李白哲
ㆍ저자명 : 李白哲
목차
세계교정이념의 흐름과 한국교정Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 포스트모더니즘과 범죄학
Ⅲ. 모더니즘과 교도소의 본질
Ⅳ. 포스트모더니즘과 형사사법
Ⅴ. 모더니즘과 한국교정
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
영어 초록
Postmodern criminology is based upon the belief that past criminological approaches have failed to realistically assess the true causes of crime and have therefore failed offer workable solutions for crime control or if they have, that such theories and solutions may have been appropriate at one time but no longer apply to the postmodern era. It challenges and debunks existing perspectives on crime and crime control. Upon such assumptions, the article examines how we conceive of penal policy or prison in contrast to how it is conventionally understood, and outlines what an alternative direction might look like. It introduces peacemaking criminology, constitutive criminology and restorative justice for the development of a new “replacement discourse”. Peacemaking criminology holds that crime-control agencies and the citizens they serve should work together to alleviate social problems and human suffering and thus reduce crime. The main purpose of criminology is to promote a peaceful, just society rather than standing on empirical analysis of data, by drawing its inspiration from religious and philosophical teachings. Constitutive criminology builds on the belief that crime and its control cannot be separated from the totality of the structural and cultural contexts in which it is produced. Given this interrelated nature of social structure and human agents and their social and cultural productions in the coproduction of crime, it trys to promote a just policy of reconstruction through replacement discourse which is directed toward the dual process of deconstructing prevailing structures of meaning and displacing them with new conceptions, which convey alternative meaning. Restorative justice has been practiced as an alternative to existing justice system beyond philosophical teaching or religious ideology in various countries. It seeks to attain a balance between the legitimate needs of the community, the offender, and the victim. The healing of all parties involves many aspects, ranging from victim assistance initiatives to legislation supporting victim's compensation. It follows such guidelines that community are victims, we use punishment to pay back the community, we combine punishment with help, and we give community a voice in shaping restorative sanctions.참고 자료
없음"矯正硏究"의 다른 논문
- 교정참여인사의 활동실태와 개선방안19페이지
- 사회봉사명령제도의 제문제점35페이지
- 한국 교정․보호 조직의 발전방향23페이지
- 수형자 직업교육훈련의 개선방안에 관한 연구26페이지
- 韓國 地域社會 矯正 戰略과 向後 課題 - 地域社會의 感覺 假說을 中心으로 -29페이지
- 死刑制度에 관한 硏究34페이지
- 범죄자 처우모델의 결합론적 모색28페이지
- 藥物中毒再㓉을 위한 프로그램이 마약관련 在所者들에게 미치는 영향에 대한 연구31페이지
- 가석방제도의 개선방안39페이지
- 행형의 목적과 수용자 인권36페이지