Effects of Thoracic Mobilization and Core Stability Exercise on Shoulder Pain, Range of Motion, and Function in Patients after Rotator Cuff Repair
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2023.05.22
- 최종 저작일
- 2021.12
- 10페이지/
어도비 PDF
- 가격 4,000원
![할인쿠폰받기](/images/v4/document/ico_det_coupon.gif)
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 국제물리치료학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research / 12권 / 4호
ㆍ저자명 : Yusung Jang, Wansuk Choi, Kyunhee Cho, Soonhee Kim
목차
INTRODUCTION
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Trial design
Subjects
Outcome Measures
Interventions
Experimental Procedures
Data and Statistical Analysis
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
영어 초록
Background: Patients who underwent rotator cuff repair (RCR) require management to control pain and prevent re tear and stiffness. Thoracic mobilization has been applied for the improvement of vertebra and shoulder movements and pain reduction. Also, core stability exercise is an intervention necessary for rehabilitation after shoulder surgery. Objectives: To examine the short term benefits of thoracic mobilization and core stability exercise for patients after RCR. Design: Randomized controlled trial with multi arm parallel group and single blind assessor. Methods: 30 participants after RCR were recruited. Participants were categorized into conventional physical therapy (CPT) group, thoracic mobilization (TM) group, and core stability exercise (CSE) group according to the randomization program. Each treatment, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimuli (TENS), TM, and CSE was applied to each group. 3 physical therapists only conducted evaluations; VAS (visual analogue scale), ROM (range of motion), and Korean version of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). Results: VAS and SPADI were statistically reduced, and ROM was statistically improved in all 3 groups. In between three group comparisons of changes in outcome variables, there was not a significant difference in VAS, but there was a significant difference in ROM and SPADI. In the post hoc test, ROM and SPADI showed a significant difference in TM and CSE compared to CPT. Conclusion: TM according to Maitland concept and CSE had beneficial effects compared to CPT in patients after RCR.
참고 자료
없음
"Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research"의 다른 논문
더보기 (3/8)