A Case Study on the Climate Change Cooperation and Capacity Building -Focused on UNITAR Jeju Cifal-GTC's program
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2023.06.19
- 최종 저작일
- 2019.03
- 9페이지/ 어도비 PDF
- 가격 4,000원
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 세계섬학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : World Environment and Island Studies / 9권 / 1호
ㆍ저자명 : Kim, Minchul, Choi, Hanna
목차
Abstract
Introduction
2017 Climate Technology Cooperation CapacityBuilding Program for Developing NationsOutcome
Satisfaction on Program’s Contents
Level of Knowledge Acquisition Through ThisProgram and Willingness to Utilize RelatedKnowledge
Survey on Technology Needed in Participants’Countries
Assessments and Improvements Needed
2018’s “Workshop on Strengthening Governancefor Low-carbon Integrated Solid WasteManagement and Circular Economy” (Jeju Island,Korea)
Participant’s Implications and ImprovementsNeeded
A Suggestion for Development of UNITAR’s cityshare program
City share knowledge management methodology
Strengths and Weaknesses of the Methodology
Conclusions
References
영어 초록
This is a descriptive case study of the capacity building program in the field of climate change cooperation achieved by UNITAR Jeju Cifal and GTC(Green Technology Center). The study included the GTC's expertise in climate technology and the UNITAR's collaboration program, an international training body in the environment, peace and security. First, in this study, the results of the satisfaction survey of the education and training in 2017 were analyzed. Education demand for climate change adaptation was shown to be high, and technology demand needed in developing countries was found to be the highest demand for ecosystem monitoring/restoration. Second, an analysis of the program for 2018 showed that South Korea's Eco-city project case is also worth referring to Asian Pacific countries. It was also found that exchanges and discussion activities among participants were more helpful than simple lectures. Meanwhile, development of city-share programs, including self-evaluation, was found to be necessary. Finally, we discussed ways to improve the city-share program in UNITAR. Sharing urban information among peers in this program is beneficial. However, it is necessary to plan programs that have a prior understanding of the culture and background of participants. And it is also important for participants to follow up on their own goals by setting up action plans and checking them after training. It is also necessary to make it clear to participants that there is an organic connection at each stage of the program. That way, participants will set up and plan problems in the climate technology sector of their own country or city, and the effect of education and training will be even greater.
참고 자료
없음
"World Environment and Island Studies"의 다른 논문