근대주의 건축에서 모더니티 표상의 문제 - 장식의 배제와 표면의 부각을 중심으로 -
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국건축역사학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 건축역사연구 / 15권 / 4호
ㆍ저자명 : 강혁
ㆍ저자명 : 강혁
영어 초록
Introducing International Style, P. Johnson and H. R. Hitchcock gave three standards to be the Modern, volume and surface, regularity, and exclusion of applied decoration. In spite of the negation of stylistic, formal approach in the Modernist Manifestoes, one usually have understood Modernity in Architecture with its formal character, especially with no ornament and flat, abstract, white surface. Modernism as a new paradigm in architecture have emphasized that there is no representation of anything outside and only present architecture in itself. They said that Modernism only cared about the language of Architecture without figural reference. So apparently there is no way to prove to its Modernity with formal condition. Modernity is in Spirit and contents. But actually we understand well its existence by visual communication This study deals with this difficult situation how Modernity represents itself without visual media and asks the question how simultaneously it presents its thingness and materiality In order to analyse contradictory situation between representation and presentation in Modern Architecture we need to survey the historical process of changing position of ornaments and its meaning in time. With the crisis of representation the role of ornament have seriously changed and divided. It caused the two situation in pre-Modern Architecture. Firstly, Architecture tend to be a high art and formal expression became important much more. The Use of Ornament became a kind of fashion to show the power, class, money. Secondly, Ornament lost its cultural weight and the structure and material aspect became the central in architecture. Rational Structuralism would be the essential character in Modern Architecture. Here the theory of G. Semper and A. Loos on cladding(dressing) and Ornament can help its problems and limits. In the situation without conventional ornament Modernists need to present modernity with new media that only show the thing itself and by that it does not represent any thing else as like the value, idea outside buildings. They believed that only it concerned esthetics and morality in architecture. But in reality it referred to art and machines as like ships, aircraft, and cars. By excluding Ornament and showing the process of clearing, abstract, flat, white surface 'represent' Modernity by the indirect way referring the concept of transparency, reason, sanitation, tectonics, etc. An Ideology and myth intervened architectural discourse to make the doxa about the representation in Architecture. Surface must be a different kind of media and message that can communicate in different way with compared to conventional Ornament. Decorated Shed by R. Venturi and Post-Functionalism by P. Eisenman, that are the most famous post-modern discourse, shows well difficult and contradictory condition in contemporary architecture concerning representation and form, meaning and form.참고 자료
없음"건축역사연구"의 다른 논문
반 자연주의 미학 -서울 시청사 계획안-6페이지
오스트레일리아와 뉴질랜드의 목조주택 생산체계와 기술 -현지조사 보고-16페이지
목조건축의 맞춤과 이음에 대한 소고 (1) -봉정사 극락전 구조재를 중심으로-15페이지
영국(Great Britain) 축성(Architectures of Castles)의 역사자료 -잉..14페이지
창덕궁 집상전과 파리 국립도서관 소장 "집상전수개도감의 궤"6페이지
독락당(獨樂堂) 일곽(一郭)과 향단(香壇)의 해체예술론(解體藝術論)적 고찰 - Christopher..19페이지
보 결구를 통해 본 중국 절강지역과 고려시기 목조건축과의 관계 - '차견(箚牽)'과 초방(草枋), ..12페이지
건축 입면의 깊이에 관한 연구 - Paul $Cacute{e}zanne$의 회화를 중심으로 -17페이지
이성주의의 기억말소와 비올레 르 뒥의 근대건축이론14페이지
문화.역사마을가꾸기 체험프로그램 개발방법에 관한 연구 -2005 안동 군자마을 문화.역사마을가꾸기 ..16페이지