어업인의 어종별 어획쿼터제도 유형의 선호도 분석
(주)코리아스칼라
- 최초 등록일
- 2023.10.23
- 최종 저작일
- 2023.09
- 12페이지/
어도비 PDF
- 가격 4,300원
![할인쿠폰받기](/images/v4/document/ico_det_coupon.gif)
* 본 문서는 배포용으로 복사 및 편집이 불가합니다.
서지정보
ㆍ발행기관 : 한국수산경영학회
ㆍ수록지정보 : 水産經營論集 / 54권 / 3호
ㆍ저자명 : 심성현
목차
I. 서 론
Ⅱ. 어종별 어획쿼터제도의 개념 및 필요성
1. 어종별 어획쿼터제도의 개념
2. 어종별 어획쿼터제도의 필요성
Ⅲ. 분석 방법
1. 컨조인트 분석
2. 속성과 수준
Ⅳ. 분석 결과
1. 속성의 중요도 및 순위
2. 속성의 효용 추정
3. 최적조합 도출
Ⅴ. 결 론
영어 초록
In this study, a conjoint analysis was conducted to derive a combination of fishing quota management system by fish species preferred by fishermen. In the analysis, detailed levels were set according to each attribute of the system. For analysis, this study conducted a design question survey for conjoint analysis on 303 fishermen engaged in fishing activities in the offshore and coastal sea. The Conjoint analysis was conducted on all fishermen, offshore fishermen and coastal fishermen. In addition, an analysis was conducted on TAC system participants and non-TAC system participants, and the targets were classified for comparison according to the characteristics of fishermen. Fishermen’s preference for the system confirmed for six attribute (“catching fish even if there is no fishing quota”, “how to allocate fishing quota”, “fishing quota management agency”, “upper limit of fishing quota,” “Possibility of Trading in the Fishing Quota”, and “Application of Other Regulations.”) and the detailed level of each attribute. As a result of the analysis of the importance of attributes, fishermen thought that “fishing quota management agency (24.1%)” was very important, and “catching fish even if there is no fishing quota (23.9%)” and “how to allocate fishing quotas (22.9%)” were also given some importance.
참고 자료
없음