“In an age of international terrorism, the law on self-defence needs to be expanded to include the right to pre-emptive self-defence.” Evaluate the arguments both for and against this proposition.
- 최초 등록일
- 2009.05.21
- 최종 저작일
- 2009.02
- 13페이지/
MS 워드
- 가격 30,000원
![할인쿠폰받기](/images/v4/document/ico_det_coupon.gif)
소개글
테러시대에 선제공격성 자위권은 국제법에 포함되어야 하는가에 대한 찬반론
목차
없음
본문내용
In this era, the entire international communities are facing a grave threat from terrorism. Especially, the traits of modern terrorism maximize the fear. The common traits of traditional and modern terrorism can be described as political nature and purpose, rare involvement with any states and organized violence. Also, they are non-states actors who do not abide by international laws or norms. Modern terrorism upholds all these traits and possesses few new properties as well. It is unpredictable, fast, devastating and transnational. Therefore, some states emphasize the importance of the right of pre-emptive self-defence. That is, states should be able to prevent or impede the potential and predicted attacks to their territory before terrorists launch their strikes. However, the Charter of United Nations prohibits the use of force by states.
The UN Charter is the most authoritative reference for most political and legal issues related to international relations includes the states’ use of force. The condition of the use of force is elucidated in Article 2(4).
참고 자료
없음