생산운영관리-페페진스 케이스 분석
- 최초 등록일
- 2010.06.09
- 최종 저작일
- 2010.06
- 9페이지/
MS 파워포인트
- 가격 1,500원
![할인쿠폰받기](/images/v4/document/ico_det_coupon.gif)
소개글
생산운영관리 원어 수업 페페진스 케이스 사례 분석입니다
발표 . 준비에 사용하시면 좋습니다
목차
케이스 써머리,
1번 문제
2번 문제, 팀 의견
본문내용
Case Study : Pepe Jeans
Pepe Jeans
Pepe offered a better fit than traditional 5- pocket Wsettern jeans.
Agents take orders from retailer for six-month deliver. After Pepe receives an order, the retailer has only one week in which to cancel.
Current situation
Pepe Jeans’ current situation: Unit Price = 45, Sale = 200M, Cost of sale = 40% = 80M, Operating Expense = 28% = 56M, Profit before taxes = 32% = 64M, Future expenses: Investment in new equipment = 1M, Operation cost per year = 500,000 Renovation cost = 300,000
1. Case Summary
Case Study : Pepe Jeans
Flexible system would lead to an increase in the sales of about 10%
Current Sales - 200,000,000
10% of 200,000,000 would be 20,000,000
Focus
Acting as an outside consultant, what would you recommend that Pepe do? Given the data in the case, perform a financial analysis to evaluate the alternatives that you have identified. (Assume that the new inventory
Question 2
Are there other alternatives that Pepe should consider ?
The other alternative that Pepe could consider could be to continue with the current arrangement. It is excellent from the financial point of view but it is vulnerable from the maketing point of view. If Pepe continues to insist on requirements to place firm orders six months in advance with no possibility of amendment, cancellation, or repeat ordering, it is a matter of time before the retailers turned to other manufacturers who allowed more flexibility.
Some other alternatives that Pepe could consider could include sourcing its jeans in some other country where there were more cost advantages and greater flexibility. Finally, Pepe could consider the case where the entire manufacturing was transferred to UK, the financial strength of the company could finance it and this step would provide it with great flexibility and responsiveness to independents.
참고 자료
없음