cisg article33에 대한 case분석
- 최초 등록일
- 2010.09.10
- 최종 저작일
- 2010.06
- 2페이지/ MS 워드
- 가격 2,000원
소개글
- 성균관대학교 2010학년도 1학기 박은옥교수님의 무역상무 수업 과제
- http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061225c1.html 의 케이스를 분석하여
제시된 form에 맞추서 작성
- CISG article33에 대한 케이스
- 대단히 많은 시간을 들였으며 노력이 많이 들어간 리포트
- 성적은 a+
목차
1. Fact of the case
2. Procedure of the case
1) Buyer’s claims
2) Defense of seller1
3) Defense of seller2
3. Result of the case
4. My opinion
5. Reference
본문내용
. 3. Six faucets also were lost in shipments. 4. Moreover, seller1 did not deliver the goods in a fixed time.
For above reasons, buyer requested the court to rule that seller1 should compensate buyer the economic loss of US$16,682.40 and attorneys’ fee of RMB6,500. Buyer also requested that seller2 should undertake joint responsibility on seller1’s obligation. About invalidity of lawsuit which seller2 claimed, buyer argued that the present lawsuit is a new one.
2) Defense of seller1
Seller1 agreed that the breach of contract alleged by buyer is true. Seller1, however, also argue that seller2 was responsible for the contents of
참고 자료
http://cisgw3.law.pace.edu/cases/061225c1.html