AN INNATIST MODEL: KRASHEN`S INPUT HYPOTHESIS

소개글

AN INNATIST MODEL: KRASHEN`S INPUT HYPOTHESIS

목차

AN INNATIST MODEL: KRASHEN`S INPUT HYPOTHESIS

◎ Krashen`s Hypothesis
1.The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis
2.The Monitor Hypothesis
3.The Natural Order Hypothesis
4.The Input Hypothesis
5.The Affective Filter Hypothesis

◎ criticism

1. McLaughlin
2. Gregg
3. Krashen`s view "comprehensible input is the only causative variable on second language acquisition."
4. Seliger
5. Notion of i +1 is nothing new and we are not able to define i and 1.
6. Krashen`s view: Speech will "emerge" in a context of comprehensible input.

본문내용

AN INNATIST MODEL: KRASHEN`S INPUT HYPOTHESIS

◎ Krashen`s Hypothesis

1.The Acquisition-Learning Hypothesis
(1) acquisition & learning
▸acquisition : a subconscious and intuitive process of constructing the system of a language, not unlike the process used by a child to "pick up" a language
▸learning : a conscious process in which learners attend to form, figure out rules, and are generally aware of their own process
"fluency in second language performance is due to what we have acquired"

(2) our acquisition processes and learning processes are mutually exclusive
: learning cannot become "acquisition"
-This claim of "no interface" between acquisition and learning is used to strengthen
the argument for recommending large doses of acquisition activity in the classroom.

2.The Monitor Hypothesis
:"Monitor" is involved in learning and is a device for "watchdogging" one`s input, for editing and making alternations or correction.

이하생략

참고 자료

principles of language learning and teaching