Terrorism, torture in 24
*승*
다운로드
장바구니
소개글
서울대학교 고급영어 Term Paper 입니다. Terrorists에게 torture를 가하는 것의 정당성에 관한 레포트입니다(나의 의견이 주를 이룸)목차
없음본문내용
§ Preface : In this paper, I argue for the permissibility of torture in idealized cases by application of separation of cases: if torture is permissible given any of the dominant moral theories (and if one of those is correct), then torture is permissible simpliciter and I can discharge the tricky business of trying to adjudicate among conflicting moral views. To be sure, torture is not permissible on all the dominant moral theories as at least Kantianism will prove especially recalcitrant to granting moral license of torture, even in idealized cases. Rather than let the Kantian derail my central argument, I directly argue against Kantianism (and other views with similar commitments) on the grounds that, if they cannot accommodate the intuitions in ticking time-bomb cases, they simply cannot be plausible moral views. Finally, I postulate that, even if this paper has dealt with idealized cases, it paves the way for the justification of torture in the real world like that of 24 by removing some candidate theories (e.g., Kantianism) and allowing others that both could and are likely to justify real-world torture.참고 자료
Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, “Coherentist Epistemology and Moral Theory,” in Timmons and Sinnott-Armstrong (1996), p.178J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams, "Utilitarianism; For and Against", Cambridge University Press, 1973, p.80
Jean Maria Arrigo, “A Utilitarian Argument against Torture,” Science and Engineering Ethics 10.3 (2004): 1–30 and Matthew Wynia, “Consequentialism and Harsh Interrogations,” American Journal of Bioethics 5.1 (2005): pp. 4–6.
John Kleinig, “Ticking Bombs and Torture Warrants,” Deakin Law Review 10.2 (2005): In press.
Michael Sandel, Justice : what’s the right thing to do, Farrar Straus Giroux, 2010
Rawls A Theory of Justice, (Cambridge, MA: Belnap Press, 1999) and Sayre-McCord, “Coherentist Epistemology and Moral Theory,”
Robert Audi “Intuitionism, Pluralism, and the Foundations of Ethics.” For more detailed discussion, see Ethical Intuitionism: Re-Evaluations, ed. Philip Lake-Stratton (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Ronald Dworkin, Taking Rights Seriously Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977
Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974),
pp. 28–33.
Robert Nozick, Anarchy, State, and Utopia, 33
Dialogues containing the appearances of Utilitarianism in 24.