The debate about hell(Love Wins of Rob Bell)
- 최초 등록일
- 2012.12.01
- 최종 저작일
- 2012.05
- 21페이지/
MS 워드
- 가격 2,500원
![할인쿠폰받기](/images/v4/document/ico_det_coupon.gif)
소개글
이 자료는 랍 벨의 저서인 "사랑은 이긴다"에 나타난 지옥에 대한 견해에 대해서 신학적, 성경적, 복음주의적 관점에서 다루고 있습니다. 영어로 쓰여졌으며, 영어 원서인 "Love wins"를 인용했습니다.
목차
Abstract
Introduction
Ⅰ.The background of debate about hell
Ⅱ. The challenges about the traditional view of hell
Does a loving God want save a few people?
Is hell a place that really exists?
Is punishment in hell forever?
Ⅲ. The inevitability of hell -
Theological approach about the nature of God and free will of people
Hermeneutical approach about hell
Evangelical approach for the salvation of souls
CONCLUSION
본문내용
This paper argues that hell should be taught as existing in the Biblical understanding because it is foundational in Christianity; it is the basic doctrine concerning the viewpoint of salvation to Christians, and it is essential in Jesus’ ministry. In the 21st century, traditional Christianity is faced with numerous challenges like postmodernism, pluralism, and decline of growth. Moreover, some Christian doctrines that people have believed as a truth in traditional Christianity have changed due to cultural and periodical transition. Recently, there is controversial debate about the reality of hell, and it was caused by Rob Bell’s book “Love Wins”. Although Rob Bell did not mention directly that there is no hell in his book, he doubts traditional perspectives about hell. This debate raises many questions about the nature of God’s love and judgment. Therefore, this paper looks into the problems of the debate about hell in the theological, biblical, and evangelical perspectives.
<중 략>
The inevitability of hell: Theological approach
Rob Bell’s argument about hell is an ambitious feat of synthesis, encompassing diverse theories of salvation, and a challenging debate. Although we may not agree on all the issues raised in Rob Bell’s book, we praise some of his opinion. Even though Rob Bell’s view about the reality of hell is very plausible and reasonable, his view also has many counter arguments because his view has several errors in the theological aspect. First, Rob Bell’s view about hell is placed same position with the Universalist.
참고 자료
없음