경영조직론 모더니즘, 포스트모더니즘 내용 요약본
*지*
다운로드
장바구니
소개글
경영조직론 수업 (모더니즘, 포스트모더니즘, 상징적해석주의) 내용 요약본입니다.목차
6-1. What are some of the tensions & fissures that exist between the way modernists, symbolic-interpretivists , post-modernists view and study culture and why did these emerge? Support your answer with examples from the literature or your own experience.6-2. What are the many ways organizations manage culture and how effective are these? What are the advantages & disadvantages of managing culture?
6-3. Can culture be managed? Discuss this question from each of the 3 perspectives.
7-1. Discuss why it is important for managers to consider the physical structure of organizations.
7-2. Modernist organization theorists talk about the physical structure of an organization as if it is real. In contrast Baudrillard`s notion of simulacra suggests there is no real, only sign & simulations concealing the absence of a reality and forcing us to live an illusion where we are nostalgic for community values and warmth (eg. Disney World). Discuss this view and its implications for organizational life.
8-1. Compare and contrast modernist, critical & post-modernist conceptions of control. What value does each approach have for designing and managing organizations?
8-2. What are the pros & cons of behavioral vs. output models of control and when might each be appropriate?
9-1. Discuss the main differences between a functional and M-form structure. When might an organization want to change its structure from functional to M-form?
9-2. How would you utilize the ideas on organizational change & learning if changing an organization`s structure from a functional to a matrix form?
9-3. You`re the CEO of an organization employing around 400 people. Your goal is to encourage greater creativity in relation to product development, work process/technology, and problem solving. How might you utilize the ideas in Chapter 9 to help you achieve this goal?
9-4. How might modern, symbolic-interpretive & post-modern conceptualizations of organizational change differ & why?
10-1. Discuss the implications of a paradigmatic view of organization studies for theory and practice.
10-2. What implications does the debate on paradigm commensurability have for critical realism? (Critical realism draws on functionalist and interpretivists paradigms)
10-3. Compare and Contrast modernist and symbolic-interpretive conceptions of organization identity. How might these influence the way you would study organizational identity?
본문내용
6-1. What are some of the tensions & fissures that exist between the way modernists, symbolic-interpretivists , post-modernists view and study culture and why did these emerge? Support your answer with examples from the literature or your own experience.① 모더니스트 (As a Tool of Management)
문화(culture)에 관한 지식을 관리 도구로써 인식
문화 그 자체를 조직성과를 향상시킬 수 있도록 조종이 가능한 것으로 봄
② 상징해석주의자 (As a Context for Meaning Making & Interpretation)
문화(culture)를 의미를 만들고, 해석 되어지는 상황으로 정의내림
타문화의 이해를 통해 자기 문화를 인식할 수 있고,
문화에 따라 사물, 행동, 언어의 의미가 다양해진다.
③ 포스트모더니스트 (다양한 방법으로 해석)
문화 속에서 공유된 생각 -> 환상
권력투쟁의 폭로, 비판
정규직이 보는 관점 vs 비정규직이 보는 관점 / CEO 관점 vs 종업원 관점
6-2. What are the many ways organizations manage culture and how effective are these? What are the advantages & disadvantages of managing culture?
① Gagliardi`s Fan Model (전략과 조직 정체성으로서의 문화)
Assumption, Values를 조직문화(org culture)의 핵심으로 한다.
조직의 최우선 전략 : Assumption, Values가 창출, 유지하는 조직정체성(Organizational Identity)를 보호하는 것이다.
② The Cultural Dynamics Model (The Dynamics of Organizational Culture)
Assumption, Values, Artifacts, Symbols를 상호 연결시키는 것에 초점.
참고 자료
없음이 자료와 함께 구매한 자료
일라이 릴리(Eli Lilly) 사례 분석 (경영전략) 30페이지
모의투자 분석 보고서 [증권투자론 REPORT] 27페이지
국어와문학 (서평쓰기 개인과제) 2페이지
국제경영학 Collaborate Advantage 3페이지
세계화 정보화 시대를 주도하는 교육 개혁 방안 59페이지