The Long-lasting Syrian Civil War toward the Age of Multipolarity (다극체제 시대에 장기화되는 시리아 내전에 관한 영문보고서) 영어리포트, 에세이
행복
다운로드
장바구니
소개글
The Long-lasting Syrian Civil War toward the Age of Multipolarity(다극체제 시대에 장기화되는 시리아 내전의 원인 연구)
국제정치이론 관련 영문보고서, 영어리포트, 에세이
목차
1. Introduction : Background of Syrian Civil War2. Passing the Buck : The Theory
3. Passing the Buck : Case Study
3-1. Case Study Ⅰ : World War Ⅱ
3-2. Case Study Ⅱ : Japan’s military strategy
4. Passing the Buck : In Syria
4-1. International System : Weakening Unipolarity and Rising Multipolarity
4-2. Superpowers against Syria
1) The United States
2) China
3) The European Union
4) Russia
4-3. Testing the Theory
5. Conclusion
References
본문내용
AbstractionSince the early 2011, one of the most important international issues would be the ongoing Syrian civil war. Although the international community makes some efforts to halt the attacks on Syrian civilians, the Assad’s regime continues to upgrade the number of casualties. Why are superpowers still hesitating to intervene in Syria at first hand in order to finalize the civil war? As toward multipolarity in the contemporary era, superpowers prefer the defensive advantage to the offensive. In that sense, superpowers tend to pass the buck in international relations, applying to the Syrian civil war. As long as they pursue the trend in buck-passing, the civil war is likely to continue to last longer than we are expecting. As a result, the civil war in Syria so far hasn’t shown any clue to come to an end so far.
1. Introduction : Background of Syrian Civil War
The Syrian civil war (or Syrian uprising) is one of the most dramatic and potentially destabilizing events of the Arab Spring, began in December 2010 in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya.
참고 자료
Benn, Aluf and Stern, Yoav. “PM associates: Syria will support terror, even with Golan.” Ha’aretz. Dec. 17, 2006.Bijian, Zheng. “China's “Peaceful Rise” to Great-Power Status.” Foreign Affairs. Online. September/October 2005.
Christensen , Thomas J. and Snyder, Jack. “Chain gangs and passed buck: predicting alliance patterns in mul-tiploarity.” International Organization. Vol. 44. No.2 (Spring, 1990). pp. 138-168.
Cowling, Maurice. The Impact of Hitler. London: Cambridge University Press, 1975.
Deutscher, Isaac. Stalin: a political biography. New York: Oxford University Press, 1949.
Fischer, Louis. Russia’s Road from Peace to War. New York: Harper & Row, 1969.
Goldstone, Jack A. “Understanding the Revolutions of 2011.” Foreign Affairs. Online. May/June 2011.
Gowan, Richard. “The EU and Syria: everything but force?.” ISS. http://www.iss.europa.eu/fr/publications/detail-page/article/the-eu-and-syria-everything-but-force/. (Search date: Dec. 3, 2012)
Haass,Richard N. “The Age of Nonpolarity.” Foreign Affairs. Online. May/June 2008.
Herb, Jeremy and Munoz, Carlo. “OVERNIGHT DEFENSE: Syria alters US-Russia relations.” The Hill. (June 13, 2012). Online. Dec. 1, 2012.
Huntington, Samuel P. “The Lonely Superpower.” Foreign Affairs. Online. March/April, 1999.
Ikenberry, G. John. “The Rise of China and the Future of the West.” Foreign Affair. Online. Janu-ary/February 2008.
Jackson, Alex. “What the Crisis in Syria Holds for Turkish-Russian Relations.” The Washington Review (Feb, 2012). Online. Dec. 2012.
Khrushchev, Nikita. Khrushchev Remembers. vol. 1. Boston: Little, Brown, 1970.
Leverett, Flynt. Inheritting Syria: Bashar’s Trial by Fire. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press, 2005.
Lind, Jennifer M. “Pacifism or Passing the Buck?.” International Security. Vol. 29. No. 1 (Summer 2004). pp. 92-121.
Mearsheimer, John J. and Walt, Stephen M. The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Girous, 2007.
Peel, Michael. “Syria and Russia’s ‘special relationship’.” The Financial Times. Online. Nov. 30, 2012.
Posen, Barry R. The Sources of Military Doctrine. New York: Cornell University press, 1984.
Snyder, Glenn H. “Mearsheimer’s World-Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security.” International Security. Vol. 27. No. 1 (Summer 2002). pp. 149-173.
Vasquez, John A. and Elman, Colin. Realism and The Balancing of Power: A New Debate. New Jersey: 22. Pearson Education, Inc., 2003.
Whitlow, Derrik. “US intervention in Syria long overdue.” http://www.thedaonline.com/opinion/us-intervention-in-syria-long-overdue-1.2955651. (Search date: Dec. 4, 2012)
“China's defense budget to grow 11.2 pct in 2012: spokesman,” http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2012-03/04/c_131445012.htm. (Search date: Nov. 30, 2012)
“EU can't send troops but can help Syrian refugees,” Deutsche Welle, http://www.dw.de/eu-cant-send-troops-but-can-help-syrian-refugees/a-16288683, (Search date: Dec. 3, 2012)
“Israeli Opinion Regarding Peace with Syria and Lebanon,” www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Politics/golanpo.html. (Search date: Nov. 29, 2012)
“Military budget of the People’s Republic of China,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China. (Search date: Nov. 29, 2012)
“Russia denies supporting UN resolution for power transition in Syria,” http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/13335938-russia-denies-supporting-un-resolution-for-power-transition-in-syria, (Search date: Dec. 4, 2012)
“The killing fields,” The economist, Online, Oct. 20, 2012.