is anticolonial thought of any relevance in a postcolonial age?

소개글

"is anticolonial thought of any relevance in a postcolonial age?"에 대한 내용입니다.

목차

없음

본문내용

Where the postcolonial age means the period following the end of formal European colonialism, colonial thought has continued to inform foreign policy, some countries and institutions still engage in colonial practices, and the lingering effects of colonialism are still being felt today, sometimes manifested in forms as extreme as transnational armed conflict. Anticolonial thought can, or at the least seeks to, address the mentalities and material conditions born out of colonialism which allow for numerous wars fought or aggressive foreign policy to be carried out and so is of relevance in a postcolonial age. This essay will begin by demonstrating how former colonial empires have maintained power relations which existed during the colonial age through international institutions. The following two paragraphs will explore how colonial attitudes have persisted and continue to influence foreign policy.

참고 자료

Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2002. ‘Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others’. American Anthropologist, 104(3), pp. 783-790.
Anam, Tahmima. 2007. ‘How Bangladeshis see India’. The Guardian. 14 August. Online at: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/aug/14/india.features115 [Accessed: 27/03/2018].
Anyangwe. Eliza. 2017. ‘Why is Africa so poor?’ The Guardian. 28 June. Online at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jun/28/why-africa-so-poor-google [Accessed: 27/03/2018].
Mark Dummett. 2011. ‘Bangladesh war: The article that changed history’. BBC News. 16 December. Online at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-16207201 [Accessed: 27/03/2018].
Encyclopedia of Western Colonialism since 1450. ‘Japan, Colonized.’. 2016. Online at: https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/japan-colonized [Accessed: 27/03/2018].
Fanon, Frantz. 2001. The Wretched of the Earth. London: Penguin.
Henderson, Barney. 2017. ‘Indian Independence Day: everything you need to know about Partition between India and Pakistan 70 years on’. The Telegraph. 15 August. Online at: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/08/15/indian-independence-day-everything-need-know-partition-india/ [Accessed: 27/03/2018].
Hodd, Michael. ‘Africa, the IMF and the World Bank’. African Affairs, 86(344), pp. 331-342.
Huntington, Samuel. 1993. ‘The Clash of Civilizations?’. Foreign Affairs. 72(3), pp. 22-49.
Pilger, John. 2002. The New Rulers of the World. London: Verso.
Said, Edward. 1994. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books.
Sabaratnam, Meera. 2011. ‘IR in dialogue… but can we change the subjects? A typology of decolonising strategies for the study of world politics’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(3), pp. 781-803.
The Press and Information Office of the Federal Government. 2018. ‘European Union’. Online at: https://www.g7germany.de/Webs/G7/EN/G7-Gipfel_en/Teilnehmer_en/8_EU_en/_node.html [Accessed: 27/03/2018].
UN [a]. 2018. ‘Voting System and Records’. Online at: http://www.un.org/en/sc/meetings/voting.shtml [Accessed: 27/03/2018].
UN [b]. 2018. ‘The Security Council’. Online at: http://www.un.org/en/sc/ [Accessed: 27/03/2018].
Vitalis, Robert. 2000. ‘The Graceful and Generous Liberal Gesture: Making Racism Invisible in American International Relations’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(2), pp. 331-56.
Woods, Ngaire. 2008. ‘Who owns the IMF?’ The Guardian. 8 October. Online at: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/oct/08/interestrates.banking [Accessed: 27/03/2018].