소개글
정책평가를 계획하는 데 반드시 고려해야 할 요소들을 정리한 것입니다.
참고문헌을 함께 수록했습니다.
목차
INTRODUCTION
IMPORTANT ELEMENTS IN EVALUATION
THE KEY INGREDIENTS OF EFFECTIVE EVALUATION
The framework for evaluation research
Evaluation Questions
The evaluator for the stakeholder
Evaluability Assessment
Evaluating and Utilizing Evaluation
CONCLUSION
본문내용
The evaluation process constitutes an essential part of the public policy cycles. Most policies or programmes are to be assessed and depending on the results, they are continued, changed or terminated. Thus, evaluation is crucial one of a set of activities for making policy. Evaluation results serve as modes of decision-making for either solving particular problems in the policy formation stage or improving the policy procedures since the policy was implemented. It helps programme managers to improve the programme management and operation. Particularly, the summative evaluation determines effectiveness of the policies or programmes concerned and concludes impact on the problems supposed to be addressed (Parsons, 1995: 550).
Whatever purposes evaluation aims at, the results should be fed back to some stage of the policy processes. In order to utilize the evaluation results, various scientific methods and methodologies are employed to collect and analyze the information.
This paper, therefore, seeks to review the essential elements to make evaluation more effective and then to discuss key ingredients of effective evaluation respectively, in order to achieve the objectives of public policy.
참고 자료
Clarke, A. and Dawson, R. (1999), Evaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice. Sage Publications
Glendinning, C. (2002), “Partnerships between health and social services: developing a framework for evaluation”, Policy & Politics, Vol 30, no 1: 115-127
Haubrich, D. (2001), “UK rail privatisation five years down the line: an evaluation of mime policy objectives”, Policy & Politics, Vol 29, no 3: 317-336
Howlett, M. and Ramesh, M. (2003), Studying Public Policy, Policy Cycles and Policy Subsystems, 2nd ed., Oxford
Kim. H. K. (2003), “Analytical review of major policy evaluation system in Korea”, Korean Public Policy, Vol 12, no 4: 291-314, The Korean Association for Public Studies (in Korean)
Mo. C. H. (2003), “An application of a Multi-dimensional policy evaluation methodology on rail privatisation: an analysis of UK rail privatisation”, Korean Public Policy, Vol 12, no 1: 249-272, The Korean Association for Public Studies (in Korean)