사회복지현장실습생이 인식하는 바람직한 수퍼바이저 유형에 관한 연구

서지정보

ㆍ발행기관 : 한국사회복지교육협의회 ㆍ수록지정보 : 한국사회복지교육
ㆍ저자명 : 이홍직, 이현숙

목차

I. 서론
II. 선행연구
III. 연구방법
IV. 연구결과
V. 결론 및 함의

한국어 초록

This study aims to identify the characteristics of supervisors in the social work arena by
types. In order to accomplish the purpose of this study, it used the Q method. It explored
the preference of 34 undergraduate students who finished social work practicum.
As a result, it was generally classified into four desirable supervisors types; ‘professional
and educational type’, ‘moral and practice type’, ‘open-mind and respect type’ and
‘independence and supporting type’.
Regarding the characteristics of each type, type I means that supervisors have maintained
the professional knowledge and skills and, at the same time, they should be able to discover
the full potential of students. Type II intends that should provide role model to be moral and
ethical. Type III means that supervisors and students can easily meet each other on the
basis of mutual respect. Type IV intends that supervisor ensures students' autonomy to find
their own way. On the other hands, students, in general, expressed antipathy for oppressive
supervisors.
In conclusion, this study suggests a basic guideline for supervisors in social work
practicum in order to achieve the original purpose of field education and satisfy social work
students’ needs.

영어 초록

This study aims to identify the characteristics of supervisors in the social work arena bytypes. In order to accomplish the purpose of this study, it used the Q method. It exploredthe preference of 34 undergraduate students who finished social work practicum.As a result, it was generally classified into four desirable supervisors types; ‘professionaland educational type’, ‘moral and practice type’, ‘open-mind and respect type’ and‘independence and supporting type’.Regarding the characteristics of each type, type I means that supervisors have maintainedthe professional knowledge and skills and, at the same time, they should be able to discoverthe full potential of students. Type II intends that should provide role model to be moral andethical. Type III means that supervisors and students can easily meet each other on thebasis of mutual respect. Type IV intends that supervisor ensures students' autonomy to findtheir own way. On the other hands, students, in general, expressed antipathy for oppressivesupervisors.In conclusion, this study suggests a basic guideline for supervisors in social workpracticum in order to achieve the original purpose of field education and satisfy social workstudents’ needs.

참고 자료

없음